The Setting Sun by Osamu Dazai

  The Setting Sun by Osamu Dazai


Hello Bookworms,


Here I am again with another existential book's review. 


When I first read The Setting Sun by Osamu Dazai, I felt a deep sadness. The story is about a family that was once rich and respected but now struggles to survive. It made me think about how life can change so quickly, and how difficult it is to accept that things will never be the same again.


The novel is told from the perspective of Kazuko, a 29-year-old woman who used to belong to an aristocratic family. She once had a comfortable life, but now, after World War II, everything is different. Her father has died, her brother Naoji is missing, and she and her mother have lost their wealth. They can no longer afford to live in Tokyo, so they move to the countryside.


Kazuko tries to adjust to her new life, working in the fields and calling herself a "coarse woman." But deep down, she feels lost. She remembers the past, when life was easier, and struggles to accept the present. Her mother, who represents the old aristocratic values, refuses to believe that their way of life is truly over. She still acts with grace and dignity, even though they are now poor.




Then, one day, Naoji returns. But he is not the same. He was once a bright and hopeful young man, but now, he is addicted to opium and drinks too much. He is cruel to his mother and sister and spends most of his time with writers and intellectuals in Tokyo. Kazuko finds his Moonflower Journal, where he writes about his pain, his addiction, and his disappointment with the world. His words are full of sadness and anger. He feels trapped between his aristocratic past and the new society that no longer respects people like him.


"The more I regretted, the more certain it seemed that the future had in store for us only horrible, evil things."


Naoji’s words made me think about how hard it is to let go of the past. He sees no future for himself, and instead of trying to move forward, he chooses self-destruction. His suffering is painful to read because it feels so real.


One of the biggest themes in the book is waiting. Kazuko, Naoji, and their mother are all waiting—for something to change, for happiness to return, for a future that may never come. Kazuko even says:


"To wait. In our lives we know joy, anger, sorrow and a hundred other emotions, but these emotions all together occupy a bare one percent of our time. The remaining ninety-nine percent is just living in waiting."


This line really stayed with me. It made me wonder how much of my own life is spent waiting for things to get better instead of taking action.


As the story continues, Kazuko writes letters to Uehara, a novelist who was once a friend of her brother. She tells him that she loves him and wants to have his child, even though she knows he is an alcoholic. She dedicates her letters to M.C., which she first calls "My Chekhov" and later "My Child." She believes that by having a child, she can create a new life, free from the old traditions and restrictions.


But Uehara does not respond. This silence makes Kazuko’s loneliness even deeper. She is searching for something to give her life meaning, but no one seems to care.


Meanwhile, her mother becomes sicker and is diagnosed with tuberculosis. Kazuko takes care of her, but she knows that death is coming. One day, she sees a black snake on the porch. She remembers that when her father died, there were snakes everywhere. Snakes, in this story, seem to be a sign of death and misfortune. Not long after, her mother dies.


This moment was heartbreaking for me. Her mother, who always tried to hold on to the old ways, is now gone. Kazuko is truly alone.


Then, the worst happens Naoji takes his own life. He leaves a letter for Kazuko, explaining his reasons. He says he cannot escape his aristocratic background, and he feels weak. He rejects all ideologies capitalism, communism, aristocracy because he believes they all suppress the individual. He sees no place for himself in the world.


"Life is too painful, the reality that confirms the universal belief that it is best not to be born."


Reading this line, I felt a deep sadness. Naoji could not find a way to survive, and instead of fighting, he gave up. His death is a powerful moment in the novel, showing the ultimate cost of despair.


But unlike Naoji, Kazuko does not give up. She finally meets Uehara, and she becomes pregnant with his child. In her final letter, she tells him that she will raise the child alone. She no longer believes in the old morality and wants to create her own way of life. She calls Uehara M.C. one last time, but now it means "My Comedian." This change shows that she no longer sees him as a great figure in her life just another flawed human being.


Kazuko’s decision is powerful. She refuses to let the past control her, and she chooses to move forward, even if it means going against society’s expectations.



The Setting Sun is a sad and emotional novel. It made me think about how difficult it is to accept change, how easy it is to fall into despair, and how hard it is to move forward. Osamu Dazai’s writing is simple but powerful, making me feel the loneliness and pain of his characters.


Kazuko’s journey is one of survival. She loses everything her wealth, her family, and her old way of life. But in the end, she makes a choice to live on her own terms. Her story is tragic, but it also has a sense of hope.


Naoji’s story, on the other hand, is heartbreaking. He cannot escape his past, and his despair leads him to destruction. His words, full of sadness and frustration, stayed with me long after I finished the book.


One of the most thought-provoking lines in the novel is:


"Learning is another name for vanity. It is the effort of human beings not to be human beings."


This made me question whether knowledge truly helps people or only makes life more complicated. Naoji, Uehara, and the other intellectuals in the book seem to suffer because they understand the world too well.


In the end, The Setting Sun is a story about loss, survival, and change. It is about how hard it is to move forward when everything around you is falling apart. But it is also about the power of choice. While Naoji chooses death, Kazuko chooses life. This contrast makes the novel even more impactful.


This book left a deep impression on me. It made me reflect on my own life, my struggles, and how I deal with change. It is not just a story about post-war Japan it is a story about human emotions, something that everyone can relate to.


Hope you enjoyed reading. 

Thank you for your time...


Worksheet of The Only Story

Worksheet of The Only Story



Hello 
This blog is the part of worksheet activity assigned by Dilip sir of the paper Conteporary Literature unit The Only Story. A worksheet for postgraduate students on using ChatGPT in analyzing Julian Barnes's
novel "The Only Story". 

For detailed objectives of the worksheet visit Teacher's blog.

Worksheet 1 




For the first worksheet visit the blog.  

The Only Story by Julian Barnes



Worksheet 2 





1. Explain the quotation from Julain Barnes’s novel ‘The Only Story’:

“Would you rather love the more, and suffer the more; or love the less, and suffer the less? That is, I think, finally, the only real question. You may point out – correctly – that it isn’t a real question. Because we don’t have the choice. If we had the choice, then there would be a question. But we don’t, so there isn’t. Who can control how much they love? If you can control it, then it isn’t love. I don’t know what you call it instead, but it isn’t love.”

This quote from Julian Barnes’s The Only Story questions the nature of love and suffering. It presents a dilemma: is it better to love deeply and suffer more, or to love less and suffer less? At first, it seems like a choice, but the narrator quickly dismisses that idea because love isn’t something we can control. If we could choose how much to love, then it wouldn’t truly be love. Love, by its nature, is unpredictable and overpowering.

Paul’s story is proof of this. He falls for Susan despite the consequences. Their love is passionate but leads to pain, regret, and suffering. He could not have stopped himself from loving her, nor could he have controlled how much he felt for her. His suffering was inevitable.

The novel challenges the romanticized idea that love is always beautiful and fulfilling. Instead, it shows how love often brings destruction, guilt, and loss. Paul’s love for Susan is not just about joy; it is about responsibility and the weight of choices. Barnes reminds us that love is not logical it cannot be measured or limited. If we could control love, it would lose its meaning.


2. Who is Uncle Humphrey? How / why is this minor character significant in the novel?


Uncle Humphrey is a minor but profoundly significant character in The Only Story. He is Susan’s uncle, who sexually abused her during her childhood and adolescence. Though he appears only in her recollections, his presence has left a lasting scar on her life. His abuse, described in disturbing detail, contributes to Susan’s emotional detachment, her struggles with intimacy, and possibly even her dependence on alcohol.


His significance lies in how his actions shaped Susan’s worldview. She expresses deep cynicism, saying, “There isn’t any justice, here or anywhere else.” This suggests that her early experiences with abuse made her lose faith in fairness, love, and the idea of a moral order. Her remark about the afterlife imagining Uncle Humph forever winning at bridge and demanding “party kisses” shows how his presence haunts her even in death. Uncle Humphrey also represents a broader theme in the novel: the long-lasting effects of trauma.


While Paul initially romanticizes Susan’s tragic life, he eventually realizes that she carries burdens too deep for love to fix. The novel subtly hints that her drinking and emotional struggles might be rooted in this childhood violation. Though Paul dismisses Uncle Humphrey from his mind, Susan never fully escapes his shadow.

3. While applying Gerard Genet’s tool of ‘Duration’ in narratology, how can we explain the narrative time and discourse time in Julian Barnes’s ‘The Only Story’?

Here’s how Gérard Genette’s concept of duration applies to The Only Story, using narrative time (the time events occur in the story) and discourse time (how the story is told):

Aspect Narrative Time (Story Time) Discourse Time (Narration Time)
Overall Timeframe Spans about 50 years of Paul’s life Paul narrates from an older perspective, reflecting on past events
Chronology Begins with Paul’s youthful affair with Susan and moves through her decline The narrative is non-linear, shifting between past and present reflections
Speed of Narration Some periods, like Susan’s decline, take place over years Certain moments (Paul and Susan’s early romance) are detailed, while others (her later years) are summarized
Ellipsis (Omission of Time) Large gaps in time, such as after Paul leaves Susan The novel skips years, condensing decades into brief reflections
Scene (Real-Time Representation) Key conversations, romantic moments, and arguments are depicted in detail Dialogue and inner thoughts slow down time, making some moments more immersive
Summary (Condensed Time) Paul summarizes his later years and Susan’s illness Events spanning years are narrated in a few sentences
Repetitive Narration Some events, like Susan’s suffering, are revisited multiple times Paul repeatedly reflects on his relationship, reinforcing his emotional turmoil

Barnes plays with time to show Paul’s shifting perspective his youthful idealism, middle-aged detachment, and older self’s regret all through variations in narrative duration.


4. Write brief note on the narrative pattern with its thematic & postmodernist significance:

Significant Point in Narrative Pattern Thematic & Postmodernist Significance
First-Person Retrospective Narration Paul, as an older narrator, reflects on his past, showing memory’s unreliability—aligning with postmodernist skepticism about objective truth.
Fragmented and Non-Linear Structure The story does not follow a chronological order, reflecting the chaotic nature of memory and reinforcing the idea that love and suffering cannot be neatly structured.
Shift from First-Person to Second and Third-Person Paul’s movement from "I" to "you" and "he" signals emotional detachment, showing how love transforms and distances over time. This also aligns with postmodernist play with perspective and self-awareness.
Blending of Romance and Tragedy Challenges traditional love narratives—suggesting that love is more about suffering than fulfillment, subverting romantic ideals.
Use of Repetition and Reflection Certain events and phrases are revisited, mirroring how memory distorts and how trauma lingers, reinforcing postmodernist concerns with subjectivity.
Intertextual References and Philosophical Reflections The novel engages with existential and philosophical questions (e.g., "Would you rather love more and suffer more?"), emphasizing uncertainty and lack of absolute answers—a key postmodern trait.

Overall, the narrative pattern reflects postmodernist themes of memory’s instability, love’s destructiveness, and the impossibility of objective truth, making the novel a meditation on human emotions and the ways we construct and reconstruct our past.


5. Is Julian Barnes’s ‘The Only Story’ more on suffering than on love? Explain with the help of Greek etymological meaning of ‘passion’ which means ‘suffering’.

Julian Barnes’s The Only Story is more about suffering than love, as it explores the painful consequences of deep emotional attachment. The Greek root of ‘passion’ (πάσχω, pascho) means ‘to suffer,’ highlighting how love often brings pain rather than joy. Paul’s love for Susan leads to heartbreak, helplessness, and regret rather than fulfillment. His passion becomes a burden, mirroring tragic love stories from literature and mythology. Instead of an idealized romance, the novel presents love as a force that consumes and damages, proving that the intensity of love often comes with unbearable suffering.


6. How would you prove that Julian Barnes’s ‘The Only Story’ is a memory novel?

Important Point in the TrajectoryIllustrations from the Novel
Narration from Paul’s Older SelfThe novel is told from the perspective of an older Paul, who reflects on his youthful love affair with Susan.
Shift from First to Second and Third PersonPaul starts narrating in the first person but later shifts to the second and third person, showing his emotional distance from the past.
Selective and Unreliable MemoryPaul admits that memory reshapes events, making his recollections subjective rather than factual.
Repetitive Reflection on Love and SufferingThe novel continuously revisits key moments, emphasizing how memories shape one’s understanding of love and loss.
Fragmented and Non-Linear NarrativeThe novel does not follow a strict chronological order but jumps between different phases of Paul’s life, mirroring how memory works.
Nostalgia and RegretPaul looks back with both fondness and sorrow, questioning the choices he made and the inevitability of suffering in love.

This structure highlights how The Only Story functions as a memory novel, reconstructing the past through an introspective and fragmented lens.


7. How do you explain ‘rescue fantasy’?


The concept of a "rescue fantasy" refers to a psychological trope where a person typically a man believes they can "save" a woman from her difficult circumstances, often romanticizing the idea of being her savior. This fantasy is deeply rooted in fairy tales, classical myths, and cultural narratives where male heroes rescue helpless women from distress, often leading to romantic or sexual relationships.  


In The Only Story, Paul initially dismisses the idea of a "rescue fantasy" , believing that his relationship with Susan is not based on illusion but on "rescue reality." Unlike mythical figures or Marilyn Monroe whom men wanted to "rescue" only to possess Susan had no other saviors waiting for her. Paul genuinely believed he was the only one who could free her from her unhappy marriage. However, as the novel progresses, it becomes clear that his attempt to "rescue" Susan ultimately fails. Rather than saving her, he becomes overwhelmed by her struggles, leading to his own suffering and disillusionment.  


Barnes critiques the "rescue fantasy" by showing that love based on the desire to save someone is neither sustainable nor truly heroic. Instead, it often leads to greater suffering for both individuals involved.



1. Analyze the context of the following quote: "Why do you cheat at crosswords?"

Analysis of the Context: "Why do you cheat at crosswords?"

Question Answer
a. Who is the speaker and to whom is this question addressed? Paul asks this question to Joan, Susan’s friend.
b. What is the response given by the recipient? Joan responds with laughter and explains that after experiencing great suffering, she realizes that nothing truly matters. Cheating at crosswords, to her, is insignificant because she has "been to hell and back already." However, she draws a distinction looking at the answers in the back of the book would be real cheating.
c. Is the reference to "cheating at crosswords" repeated in the novel? The phrase itself is not frequently repeated, but it serves as a metaphor for Joan’s outlook on life her cynicism, her disillusionment, and her attempt to find small acts of rebellion in a meaningless world.
d. What inferences can be drawn from this reference? The conversation highlights Joan’s philosophy of life, shaped by suffering. Her explanation suggests a deep resignation, where she has lost faith in traditional morality or justice. The distinction she makes about what constitutes real cheating reflects a personal code of ethics in a world she sees as indifferent. Additionally, this moment foreshadows Paul’s own journey toward disillusionment and suffering, showing how the characters deal with pain in different ways.

2. Investigate the symbolic significance of ‘crosswords’ in the novel "The Only Story."

In Julian Barnes's "The Only Story," crosswords serve as a multifaceted symbol reflecting the complexities of life and relationships. Joan's habit of cheating at crosswords illustrates a coping mechanism for life's perceived meaninglessness, suggesting that in a world where "nothing fucking matters," bending trivial rules becomes inconsequential. This act underscores themes of existential despair and the search for control in an unpredictable world. Additionally, crosswords represent the intricate and often puzzling nature of human relationships. Just as solving a crossword requires deciphering clues and finding the right fit, navigating relationships involves understanding and connecting disparate pieces of human experience. The novel's narrative structure, with its fragmented memories and shifting perspectives, mirrors the process of piecing together a crossword puzzle, highlighting the challenges of making sense of past events and emotions. Thus, crosswords encapsulate the novel's exploration of memory, meaning, and the human condition. 

3. Analyze the following quote in the context of the novel: "The point of the story is 'safe and capable.'"


Analysis of the Quote: "The point of the story is 'safe and capable.'"

(a) Speaker and Addressee:

The quote is spoken by Susan Macleod and addressed to Paul, the narrator and protagonist of the novel.

(b) Significance within the Context of the Story:

Susan’s remark, “The point of the story is ‘safe and capable,’” encapsulates a central theme of the novel: the contrast between youthful romantic idealism and the harsh realities of love. Paul, as a young man, believes in passionate, transformative love, whereas Susan, with her life experiences, understands the necessity of stability and reliability in relationships.

Her words reflect her pragmatic approach—having endured an unhappy marriage, she values emotional security over romantic intensity. For Paul, however, this idea is elusive, as he is driven by an idealistic notion of love. The phrase also foreshadows the novel’s shift in tone, as Paul gradually realizes that love often leads to suffering rather than fulfillment. Ultimately, this moment underscores the novel’s meditation on love, loss, and the disillusionment that accompanies growing up.

4. Evaluate the use of the phrase "moviemaker's bromide" in the novel "The Only Story."

Evaluation of the Phrase "Moviemaker’s Bromide" in The Only Story

(a) Frequency of Use in the Novel:

The phrase "moviemaker’s bromide" appears twice in The Only Story.

(b) Situations When the Phrase Appears:

  1. During Paul’s Reflection on Redemption: Paul dismisses the idea of redemption as too simplistic and cinematic something that movies often present as a satisfying resolution, whereas real life is far messier and unresolved.
  2. During Paul’s Final Goodbye to Susan: Paul considers kissing Susan as a dramatic farewell but recognizes that such a moment belongs more to a movie cliché than real life. Instead, reality is mundane his mind drifts to trivial matters like petrol and cheese sales.

(c) Significance within the Context of the Story:

The phrase critiques the artificiality of idealized love and closure often depicted in films. Paul acknowledges that life does not offer neatly tied endings—love does not necessarily lead to redemption, nor does parting always come with grand emotional gestures. Instead, real emotions are fragmented, unpredictable, and often interrupted by mundane concerns.

By using this phrase, Barnes reinforces the postmodernist theme of deconstructing romanticized narratives, showing that love is not a fairy tale but a complex, often painful, and unresolved experience.

Thank You. 

References : 


The Only Story by Julian Barnes

FLIPPED LEARNING ACTIVITY WORKSHEET: JULIAN BARNES'S THE ONLY STORY 


Hello, 

This blog is the part of flipped learning activity task assigned by  Dilip sir. This worksheet is designed to guide our learning about Julian Barnes' novel, The Only Story. The  resources  include  video lectures and a critical analysis document. We are expected to summarise the resources, and  analyse  the  themes,  narrative  techniques  and  characterisations  used  by  Julian Barnes. 

Teacher's Worksheet is provided here for background understanding of the task. 

Video 1: Plot Summary and Characters






This video introduces the main characters and provides a summary of The Only Story, a novel by Julian Barnes, published in 2018. The novel is divided into three parts and begins with the classical definition of a novel given by Dr. Samuel Johnson in his 1755 Dictionary of the English Language:

"Novel: A small tale, generally of love."

The story follows Paul Roberts, a 19-year-old protagonist, and Susan Macleod, a 48-year-old woman. Susan is married to Gordon Macleod and has two daughters, Martha and Clara, who are older than Paul. The novel explores the love affair between Paul and Susan. It is narrated by an older Paul, who looks back on his past and reflects on his only love story. Through his memories, the novel takes us fifty years back in time.
Character Description
Paul Roberts The 19-year-old protagonist who falls in love with Susan. He later narrates the story, reflecting on his past love and mistakes.
Susan Macleod A 48-year-old married woman with two daughters. She starts an affair with Paul but suffers from domestic violence and alcoholism.
Gordon Macleod Susan’s abusive husband, who represents control and societal norms. He is emotionally distant and violent.
Martha & Clara Susan’s daughters, both older than Paul. Martha takes care of Susan later in life.
Joan Gerald’s sister and Susan’s sister-in-law. She is independent, practical, and somewhat controlling.
Eric Paul’s friend, who is beaten in the street. Paul fails to stand up for him, reflecting his cowardice.




This novel has connections with Barnes's earlier work, The Sense of an Ending. It begins with an important question:

"Would you rather love more and suffer more, or love less and suffer less? That is, I think, finally, the only real question."




Though the novel tells the story of Paul and Susan, it is more about philosophical reflections on love, life, and suffering. The story begins when Paul joins a country club to play tennis. There, he meets Susan, and by chance, they become partners in a mixed doubles match. Their friendship soon turns into a romantic relationship. Paul starts driving Susan home daily, and their bond grows stronger. Eventually, they move to London and live together.

However, their relationship begins to fall apart. Susan becomes an alcoholic and starts lying to Paul. As Paul grows older, he distances himself from Susan. Seeking new opportunities, he moves abroad for work, leaving her behind. Over time, Susan's health declines, and she develops dementia. Paul, unable to take care of her, leaves her in the care of her daughter, Martha. Since the story is told from Paul's perspective, we only see his version of events, which may be incomplete or biased.

In the end, Paul attends Susan's funeral, but he feels no visible sorrow. Instead of mourning, his mind is occupied with his car's empty petrol tank. This moment reflects his emotional detachment from Susan and their past together.

Video 2: Narrative Pattern 
Narrative  Techniques:  Discuss  the  narrative  techniques  employed  by Julian Barnes in The Only Story


The narrative structure of The Only Story follows a classical framework. Paul Roberts, the protagonist, is an unreliable narrator. The novel shifts between first, second, and third-person narration. While Julian Barnes uses traditional storytelling techniques, he also incorporates postmodern elements. The themes of memory and history are explored through Paul’s unreliable perspective, showing how personal recollections can be fluid and subjective. It generally known as woven into wrap and weft. 



The novel opens with a thought-provoking question:

"Would you rather love more and suffer more, or love less and suffer less? That is, I think, finally, the only real question."

Paul then contradicts himself by saying that this is not a real question because we do not have control over how much we love. If love could be controlled, then it would not be love at all.

Paul also states:

"Most of us have only one story to tell... But there’s only one that matters, only one finally worth telling. This is mine."

Yet, in the same passage, he acknowledges that people experience countless events, which turn into countless stories. This contradiction becomes a key theme in the novel. Paul tells his version of events, but the real story might be different. Like many storytellers, he may shape his narrative to portray himself in a certain way. Another example of his inconsistency is when he claims he is not keeping a diary, only to later admit that he is. The novel is skillfully woven using memory and unfolds through flashbacks.

There is  comparison  made between Thomas Hardy and Julian Barnes. While Hardy tells a complete story with philosophical reflections, Barnes presents only fragments of a story, focusing mainly on philosophical ideas. Each part of the novel has a unique narrative style, requiring active engagement from the reader. The flashback technique adds depth but can also be disorienting at times.


Video 3: Theme of Love | Passion and Suffering
Love, Passion, and Suffering: How does the novel present love, and what is its relationship to suffering and pain? How are these ideas connected to Laconian ideas about desire?


The theme of love is central to The Only Story. The novel focuses on the relationship between Paul and Susan. At 19, Paul has a naive and immature understanding of love. For him, love is mostly about physical attraction. He does not realize the responsibilities that come with it. In this novel, love is deeply connected to both passion and suffering. Interestingly, the word "passion" comes from the Latin patior, meaning "to suffer." Although this meaning is not common today, the novel explores how love turns into passion and eventually leads to suffering for Paul, Susan, and their families.

The novel includes this famous quote:

"Man's love is of man's life a thing apart, 'Tis woman's whole existence."

Barnes questions this traditional view of love through Paul and Susan. It is Susan who falls in love with Paul and makes him her third partner. Meanwhile, Paul never marries. He stays single, holding on to his love for Susan and feeling guilty about their past.



A Lacanian perspective is to this idea, humans have hidden desires that they try to fulfill through love. These desires may be linked to people, objects, or even abstract things. Susan's marriage reflects this concept. She does not receive love or intimacy from her husband, Gordon, so she seeks both in Paul.

However, love also comes with responsibilities, which Paul repeatedly fails to fulfill. He is unable to protect Susan from Gordon’s violence and eventually runs away from the Macleod household. Similarly, he does not help his friend Eric when he is attacked on the street and later considers himself a coward. When Susan grows old and cannot take care of herself, Paul once again avoids responsibility. Instead of looking after her, he leaves her in the care of her daughter, Martha.


Video 4: Memory Novel 
Memory  and  Unreliability:  How  does  the  novel  explore  the subjective nature of memory? How does this relate to the idea of truth within a narrative?


  • Trauma is memory
  • Imperfection of memory
  • Memory priority
  • Memory and morality

"History is collective memory; memory is personal history; trauma is memory."

It compares The Only Story with the movie Memento, where the protagonist suffers from short-term memory loss and forgets everything within 15 minutes. The film raises an important question: if someone loses their memory, do they also lose moral responsibility for their actions? In postmodern times, history and memory have become more complicated. Every time we recall memories, we unintentionally alter them based on our emotions and biases. Even the facts we remember are often mixed with falsehoods.

This is exactly what happens with Paul’s narration. He keeps deceiving himself and the readers because of his guilt. Paul does not erase memories; instead, he reshapes them to suit his own needs. His unreliable narration reflects his remorse and his attempt to justify his actions.

The novel also explores the idea that every person has at least one significant story they cannot share. Paul, too, struggles to openly tell his love story. In reality, he is the villain of his own story. Instead of revealing the full truth, he tells it from his perspective to avoid facing his own mistakes. He cannot tell the real story because he knows he is the one to blame.

Paul’s mental state is marked by cowardice. He runs away instead of helping his friend Eric when he is attacked. The video also briefly mentions an American man and F-1 racer Max Verstappen, though their connection to the novel with the character of Paul.


Video 5: Joan | Character Study


Joan is the surviving sister of Gerald, Susan’s first husband, who passed away from leukemia. She is a confident and strong-willed woman who naturally takes charge in her relationships, especially with Susan. Despite her tough and witty personality, Joan is also practical. She is careful with money and pays attention to everyday expenses, such as fuel costs. This balance of humor and pragmatism shows both her intelligence and her sensible approach to life.

Joan is independent and resilient. Numbers of illustrations has been provided to prove it. She has the wounds of her father's and brother's death which leads her to do multiple sexual affair outside. Additionally, her affair with married businessman also turned out to be disaster. Then she gave up on human relationship and start having pets. 


Video 6: Two Ways to Look at Life

Two ways to look at life: How does the novel present these two extremes of viewing life?

There are two ways to look at life, or rather, two extreme perspectives with a range of views in between.




The first view compares life to being the captain of a ship. In this perspective, every choice, big or small, determines the direction of your life. Just like a captain steering a paddle steamer down a river, each decision matters. This idea emphasizes free will and personal control, suggesting that people shape their own destinies.



The second view sees life as a bump on a log. In this case, no matter what choices you think you are making, you are actually just drifting along, carried by forces beyond your control. Like a log floating down the Mississippi, you have no real control over your path. This view suggests that life is shaped by fate and external circumstances rather than individual choices.

Paul, the narrator, reflects on these two perspectives. Sometimes, he feels like he is in control of his life, making important choices. At other times, he feels powerless, as if he is simply being carried along by fate. His experience suggests that life is often a mix of both perspectives.


Video 7: Question of Responsibility 

Responsibility and Cowardice: In what ways is the  protagonist, Paul,  presented as  unreliable and cowardly? How does he avoid responsibility, and what are the consequences?

The video discusses the theme of responsibility in the novel. It begins with a quote that suggests the narrator must be careful in telling his story. This highlights the idea that responsibility is important, both in narrating events and in life. Responsibility can be seen in two ways. It can be a result of personal choice and control, or it can be shaped by larger forces beyond one's control.



A chain is used as a metaphor to explain this idea. Each person or event is like a link in a chain. If one link fails, the entire chain can break, just as relationships and life can fall apart when one part is damaged. However, the metaphor also raises a question: Is the broken link weak by nature, or was it simply overwhelmed by outside forces? This connects to the idea of blame. Instead of blaming just one person, like Gordon for his domestic violence, the video suggests that we must consider the entire chain of events. Everyone involved has some responsibility.

Paul Roberts, the narrator, reflects on his own role in life. He wonders if his mistakes were truly his fault or if they were caused by circumstances and other people, like Gordon. Blaming others is easy, but real self-reflection requires admitting one's own role in a failed relationship. In the end, the message is clear: Responsibility is not just about individual choices. It also involves recognizing the bigger picture and accepting our own part in any harm caused.

Video 8: Theme of Marriage 

Critique of Marriage: How does the novel challenge the institution of marriage?

The novel criticizes the institution of marriage. It suggests that the story presents marriage as a false or flawed arrangement. A key quote in the discussion states that a true believer in love must be against marriage, implying that love and marriage are opposites. This challenges the traditional idea that marriage is a natural or inevitable part of life, like birth and death. Instead, the novel suggests that marriage can destroy true love and lead to unhappiness.

Marriage is compared to a jewelry box that turns precious metals into worthless ones or a broken boat that can no longer sail. These images suggest that marriage loses its value over time and becomes more about responsibilities than love. The discussion also highlights how many middle-class people remain in unhappy marriages, suffering in silence, as seen in the novel’s depiction of domestic violence and emotional struggles.

Unlike older works, such as those by Thomas Hardy, which questioned marriage in a time with fewer alternatives, today, live-in relationships and divorce provide more freedom. This reduces the cultural pressure to stay in unhappy marriages. The novel does not offer a moral lesson but presents marriage as an institution that does not always lead to happiness.


Personal Reflection: Consider the question posed at the beginning of the novel: "Would you rather love the more and suffer the more, or love the less and suffer the less?".


The novel deeply explores the question posed at the beginning: "Would you rather love more and suffer more, or love less and suffer less?" Traditionally, love has been idealized in literature and mythology, from Greek myths like Hyacinth to tragic romances like Romeo and Juliet. In these stories, love always clashes with duty whether religious, patriarchal, or societal. This age-old narrative is seen in Indian films like Padmaavat, Bajirao Mastani, and Kalank, where love is often sacrificed for honor or tradition. However, this idea does not fully resonate with modern times.  


In The Only Story, Paul’s love for Susan does not lead to fulfillment but to suffering, pity, and anger. Instead of taking responsibility, he writes a joint letter to Martha and Clara to escape from his duties. At one point, he even desires a "French relationship," where an old lover arranges a new marriage for the younger one and then quietly exits the relationship but this does not happen in his case. The novel’s line, 

"In my opinion, every love, happy or unhappy, is a real disaster once you give yourself entirely,"

 reflects Paul’s experience. His love for Susan does not uplift him; instead, he falls—something that is symbolically represented in his dream sequences.  


In the modern Indian context, love is still shaped by society, culture, and surroundings. Just like Paul and Susan suffer, we see similar fates in literature Sue and Jude (Jude the Obscure), Cecily and James Harthouse (Hard Times), Gatsby (The Great Gatsby), the Creature (Frankenstein), and Bimala (The Home and the World). Love in these stories does not bring happiness but instead leaves the characters broken and deeply wounded.

Imagine you are one of the characters from the novel (other than Paul). Write a journal entry from their perspective reflecting on the events of the novel. 


Journal Entry – Martha Macleod

I don’t know why I’m writing this. Maybe because there’s no one to listen. No one who would understand.

Today was another day at the hospital, sitting by Mother’s bedside, watching her drift in and out of sleep. She doesn’t recognize me anymore. She barely speaks. The woman who once laughed, argued, and loved so recklessly is now just a shadow of herself. And I am the one left to pick up the pieces.

Paul, he left long ago. He loved her, or at least he thought he did. But love isn’t just passion and stolen moments. Love is staying when things get hard. Love is holding someone’s hand when they’re too weak to hold yours back. He never understood that. He wrote a letter instead of facing what was happening. He abandoned her when she needed him the most.

But it wasn’t just Paul. My father, Gordon, played his part too. His cruelty, his violence, the way he stripped away her confidence, bit by bit it all broke her. He made her feel worthless, like she was nothing without him. And when she finally found someone who made her feel alive, he made sure to crush that too.

Now, here she is. A broken woman trapped in a failing body. And I am the one who must be strong. I remember the asylum. The way she looked at me, confused, lost. And I hated her for it. I hated her for choosing a love that destroyed her, for leaving us with nothing but this burden. But she is my mother. And no matter how much it hurts, I will not leave her. I can’t.

Thank You.


Refernces : 

Barad , Dilip. “Flipped Learning Activity Worksheet on The Only Story.” ResearchGate, Jan. 2025, www.researchgate.net/publication/388555499_Flipped_Learning_Activity_Worksheet_on_The_Only_Story. Accessed 08 Feb. 2025. 

Barnes, Julian. The Only Story. Jonathan Cape, 2018. 

Barad, D. (n.d.-a). EXPLORING NARRATIVE PATTERNS IN JULIAN BARNES’ “THEONLY STORY.” ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371874310_EXPLORING_NARRATIVE_PATTERNS_IN_JULIAN_BARNES'_THE_ONLY_STORY

Barad, D. (n.d.-b). SYMBOLISM OF CROSSWORD PUZZLES: ORDER, INTELLECT, AND EXISTENTIAL RESPITE IN JULIAN BARNES’S ’THE ONLY STORY. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372537102_SYMBOLISM_OF_CROSSWORD_PUZZLES_ORDER_INTELLECT_AND_EXISTENTIAL_RESPITE_IN_JULIAN_BARNES'S_'THE_ONLY_STORY

Introduction | Character | Plot Summary | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 31 Jan 2022, https://youtu.be/46Lxx-C5Tg0?si=PTkqNdhioisd9Tdv 

"Joan | Character Study | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 3 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/st-w_099Yr0?si=OCoRA4CEEaHpXWq8


"Memory Novel | Memory and History | Memory and Morality | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 2 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/H4yoNBCzrUs?si=Vxc5GQPJqnbOxsYE

"Narrative Pattern | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 1 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/395rhgkig1w?si=mqvmqwWBRqOxByZ_


"Theme of Love | Passion and Suffering | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 2 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/7f7hCKtGkGI?si=gCVaaKw0ksJAn4OY


"Theme of Marriage | Critique of Marriage Institution | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 3 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/SCrSyV2jXzI?si=iLvkpeE_LlO67jpC  


"Question of Responsibility | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube3 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/uBj-ju4RuTo?si=LW1K02vT0oNaw2Fx  

"Two Ways to Look at Life | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 3 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/s7Wom7RAqI4?si=HIzHz0luge6GKnv8